Do Local Party Chairs Think Women and Minority Candidates Can Win? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment

Item

Title

Do Local Party Chairs Think Women and Minority Candidates Can Win? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment

List of Authors

David Doherty; Conor M. Dowling; Michael G. Miller

Abstract

We conducted a national survey of local party chairs that included a conjoint experiment to assess the effects of candidates’ race and gender on chairs’ assessments of their likelihood of winning a state legislative primary election in their area. Chairs from both parties viewed women candidates as just as likely as men to win the support of their base but viewed Latinx and black candidates as substantially less likely to win. The disadvantage chairs believe minority candidates face is insensitive to variation in county demographics among Republican chairs but is attenuated among Democratic chairs serving counties with larger minority populations. Our findings suggest that officials from both parties believe that minority candidates face an uphill battle with their base. This perception may color chairs’ decisions about which candidates to recruit and most vigorously support.

Date

2019

Publication Title

The Journal of Politics

Publisher

The University of Chicago Press

Identifier

DOI 10.1086/704698

Bibliographic Citation

Doherty, David, Conor M. Dowling, and Michael Miller. 2019. "Do Party Chairs Think Women and Minority Candidates Can Win? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment." Journal of Politics 81: 1282-1297.

Item sets

Site pages

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/na101/home/literatum/publisher/uchicago/journals/content/jop/2019/jop.2019.81.issue-4/jop.2019.81.issue-4/20190924/jop.2019.81.issue-4.cover.gif